Abstract
This presentation explores a new perspective on the conception of the commander-as-warrior. In recent years, armed forces of NATO member states have implemented digitalized Command, Control, and Information Systems, C2IS. C2IS enable the aggregation of information from the field and from external sources, providing all holders with a dynamic, synchronous, long-distance overview, thus making it possible for commanders to lead military operations while they themselves are located many miles from the battles. In 2017-2020, I carried out a research project that followed the revision of the Danish Army planning doctrine, the Field Manual III, including document studies and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. It was clear from the data that the conception and role of the commander was a central issue. This role seemed not only related to ideas about what was best with regards to achieving military goals, but was also linked to emotive images of what a commander should be - a physically present, brave, and determined role-model for his soldiers. The article discusses whether and how digitalization may be changing this traditional image of the military commander. With digitalized possibilities for planning and command, a pertinent question becomes whether our images of the commander-as-warrior are still adequate? Do we still need the commander to be leading at the front, or might she just as well be sitting before a computer screen in headquarters far away? And what are the implications for commander ethics?