Abstract
On a daily basis Danish troops use technologies, which are not authorized by Danish politicians or decision makers. This occurs during the use of mutual support between coalition forces. As the technological level of autonomous abilities increases, the impact of this use gets more complex to identify and analysing the limits of acceptance relevant.
The public pressure on implementing technologies increase, in order to minimize casualties, by replacing troops with robots. This makes analysing the consequences of implementing the technologies, in order to decrease the amount of casualties during stabilization operations, relevant and the topic of this project.
Conclusions are that the consequences of technological measures are considerable according to doctrine, organization, training and cultures based on two primary issues:
Computer based intelligence is not able to comply with the human skills according to issues as emotional communication and cultural relations. This makes technologies unable to build the impression of a safe and secure environment within a population.
The strategic compression, globalization and the intense use of communications create a public demand for justified decisions based on ethic considerations.
Therefore the use of unmanned technologies must be regulated by humans and focussed on tasks not influenced by ethic considerations.